Why infrastructure scanning alone isn't enough, and how taint-aware static analysis catches vulnerabilities in the application code itself.
Try KloudSec FreeA perfectly configured AWS account can still ship a SQL injection, a path traversal bug, or a hardcoded credential inside the application code running on top of it. CSPM and IaC scanning cover the infrastructure layer, the accounts, the permissions, the network. They don't read the application's source code, and a real security posture needs both: infrastructure that's locked down, and application code that doesn't hand an attacker a way in regardless.
That's what Static Application Security Testing, SAST, is for: scanning source code directly for exploitable patterns before it's deployed. The difference between a useful SAST tool and a noisy one is usually taint analysis, tracking how untrusted input (a URL parameter, a form field, an API payload) actually flows through the code to a dangerous sink (a database query, a file path, a shell command), rather than just pattern-matching on risky-looking function calls in isolation. Taint-aware analysis is what keeps the finding count realistic instead of flooding a team with theoretical issues that were never actually reachable.
KloudSec's SAST engine is taint-aware across 11 languages, with findings mapped to the OWASP and CWE Top 25, the same classification security teams and auditors already work with, so a finding isn't just "this looks risky," it's tied to a recognized vulnerability class with clear context on why it matters.
Tracks how untrusted input actually flows to a dangerous sink in the code, rather than flagging risky-looking patterns with no real reachability, which is what keeps false positives down.
Scans across the languages modern cloud teams actually ship in, so coverage doesn't stop at one stack.
Findings map directly to recognized vulnerability classes, the same classification security teams and auditors already use, not a proprietary severity label with no external reference.
Findings surface where code is actually reviewed, on the PR, not in a separate dashboard checked long after the code has already shipped.
Application code findings sit alongside cloud posture, IaC, and secrets findings in the same place, so a real risk picture doesn't require stitching together five different tools.
KloudSec connects to the code repositories that need scanning.
Static analysis runs across the codebase, tracking data flow from untrusted input sources to dangerous sinks.
Taint-tracked findings are prioritized by whether untrusted input can actually reach the vulnerable code path, not just whether a risky pattern exists somewhere in the file.
Each finding is mapped to its OWASP/CWE classification with the context needed to understand and fix it, not just a line number.
What CSPM actually means, why point-in-time audits miss most of what matters, and how continuous, agentless scanning closes the gap.
Learn moreWhy scanning Terraform and CloudFormation before deploy beats finding the same problem in production, and how it fits alongside live account scanning.
Learn morePlaintext passwords in a Lambda environment variable, a key in a public GitHub repo. Real, common, and usually found by scanning, not by luck.
Learn moreFree to start, no credit card. Connect one AWS account and see what application code (sast) finds.
Try KloudSec Free